Case study — Tanker fleets
Three tankers turned away
at the gate on a Tuesday.
Compliance in tanker movement is not overhead. It is the licence to operate, and it expires on a hundred and forty-two different dates.
Before
A folder that could not tell you the date.
Every vehicle carried a stack: explosives licence, tank calibration certificate, fitness, PESO endorsement, insurance, pollution certificate, and a driver hazmat training card that expired on its own schedule. All of it existed. All of it was filed. None of it was arranged by expiry date.
On one Tuesday three tankers were turned back at the terminal gate on lapsed calibration. The vehicles were sound and the certificates had been renewable for weeks. The loss was a day of revenue on three units, a re-slotting fee, and a conversation with the customer that cost considerably more than either.
Separately, the gap between litres loaded and litres delivered was written off as normal loss. It was calculated once a quarter, at fleet level, against a norm nobody had revisited in six years.
After
The date comes to you.
Every document is a record with an owner and an expiry. The dispatch board will not allocate a vehicle whose paperwork expires before the trip is due to end, and the renewal task appears three weeks out, assigned to a person rather than to the office.
Decanting variance is now measured per load — loaded litres against delivered litres, temperature-corrected, attributed to a driver, a route and a receiving point. The fleet norm did not need tightening by decree. It tightened on its own once each load carried a name.
Two receiving points turned out to account for a disproportionate share of the variance. That is now a metering conversation with the customer rather than a suspicion about drivers.
“The certificate was always in the file. What we never had was the date it stopped being true, sitting in front of the man allocating the vehicle.”
Fleet manager · Deccan Petrocarriers
What actually moved the needle
Three changes, in the order they mattered.
01
Expiry as a dispatch constraint
Not a reminder email — a block. A vehicle whose calibration lapses mid-trip cannot be allocated to that trip. Compliance stopped depending on somebody remembering on the right morning.
02
Loaded litres against delivered litres
One line per load instead of one number per quarter. The measurement did not change behaviour by itself; attributing it to a route and a receiving point did, within about six weeks.
03
Seal numbers on the trip record
Applied at loading, verified at discharge, photographed at both ends. It closed the last route by which a variance could be explained as a paperwork error rather than investigated as a loss.
How QuamBase handles tanker fleets →
Compliance before the vehicle moves: Sharma Transport Corporation →
Your fleet, your numbers
Bring one terminal. We’ll price it.
More customers
All case studies →The fleet made money. Half of it was paying for the other half.
Costing existed at fleet level and nowhere else. Two lanes had been subsidised by four profitable ones for three years.
Trilok Parcel Service →Paid by the seat, spent by the kilometre, measured by neither.
Occupancy was surveyed once when a contract was signed and never again. Fourteen routes were carrying air on the return leg.
Kaveri Transit →